promote collaborative learning
frame and promote collaborative learning
Guidelines and Rubric for Online Discussion Boards
The purpose of the discussion board is to frame and promote collaborative learning. Active and regular participation is not only important for me to see, but also important for you in learning the course content and in developing your thoughts and positions on various topics.
The three cardinal rules for Discussion Boards:
- Please remember that the cultural of mutual respect that is part of this course extends into the virtual classroom environment.
- Participation in these discussion boards is required.
- Participation alone is not enough; a thoughtful and meaningful approach in your posts is required. (Quality counts!)
The total of your participation in a single discussion board question (topic) will be graded on a ten point scale.
Here is the protocol for posting and contributing to an online discussion:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion Rubric:
Participating is measured by posting on 2 different days. You should make a minimum of 3 postings in total: one new thread and two thoughtful responses to different members. Your participation will be graded on a ten point scale as follows.
A Discussion (9-10 points) – participated 3 times, minimum of 3 posts
A-level postings:
- Are made in a timely fashion, giving others an opportunity to respond.
- Are thoughtful and analyze the content or question asked.
- Make connections to the course content and/or other experiences.
- Extend discussions already taking place or pose new possibilities or opinions not previously voiced.
- Are from participants aware of the needs of the community, motivate group discussion, and present a creative approach to the topic.
*If these criteria are met but the 100 word count is not met, the score will drop one point.
B Discussion (8-9 points) – participated 2 times, minimum of 2 posts
B-level postings:
- Are made in a timely fashion, giving others an opportunity to respond.
- Are thoughtful and analyze the content or question asked.
- Make connections to the course content and/or other experiences, but connections are unclear, not firmly established or are not obvious.
- Contain novel ideas, connections, and/or real-world application but lack depth, detail and/or explanation.
- Are from participants who interact freely and occasionally attempt to motivate discussion.
*If these criteria are met but the 100-200 word count is not met, the score will drop one point.
C Discussion (5-8 points) – participated 2 time, minimum of 2 posts
C-level postings:
- Are usually, but not always, made in a timely fashion.
- Are generally accurate, but the information delivered is limited.
- Make vague or incomplete connections between class content and posting by other students.
- Summarize what other students have posted and contain few novel ideas.
- Show marginal effort to become involved with group.
*If these criteria are met but the 100-200 word count is not met, the score will drop two points.
D Discussion (1-4 points) – participated 1 time, minimum 1 posts
D level postings:
- Are not made in timely fashion, if at all.
- Are superficial, lacking in analysis or critique.
- Contribute few novel ideas, connections, or applications.
- May veer off topic.
- Show little effort to participate in learning community as it develops.
*If these criteria are met but the 100-200 word count is not met, the score will drop 1 point.
F Discussion (0 points).
- Participant was rude or abusive to other course participants. In this case, the number and quality of other posts is irrelevant.
OR
- Participant failed to meet the basic criteria for the “D Discussion”.
